Allstate Ins. Co. v. Mun, — F.3d —-, 2014 WL 1776007 (2d Cir. 2014) Allstate Insurance Company seeks recovery of payments to Dr. David Mun and Nara
Willer v Kleinman, 2014 NY Slip Op 01164 (2d Dept. 2014) You agree to arbitrate or are a forced participant in an arbitration. Assuming there is no
Allstate Ins. Co. v. Phelps Memorial Hospital, 2013 NY Slip Op 33590(U)(Sup. Ct. Nassau Co. 2013) “This Court conducted a non-jury trial on matter on November 7,
Dear AAA, Insofar as 60-70 percent of most defense firms’ inventories involve AAA arbitration matters, it is important for us (well me at least) to follow
Queens Arthroscopy & Sports Medicine v Unitrin Direct Ins. Co, 2013 NY Slip Op 52021(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2013) “On March 23, 2011, plaintiff moved in
Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v Bayside Pain & Rehabilitation Medicine, P.C., 2013 NY Slip Op 50906(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2013) “Defendant moved to dismiss the complaint
Allstate Ins. Co. v Natural Healing Acupuncture, P.C., 2013 NY Slip Op 50645(U)(Civ. Ct. Kings Co. 2013) “The arbitrator failed to mention, much less follow the Appellate
Dutchess Med., P.C. v Allstate Ins. Co., 2013 NY Slip Op 23139 (City Ct. Poughkeepsie 2013) “In a de novo hearing’, the judgment of the [trial] court
American Ind. Ins. Co. v Art of Healing Medicine, P.C., 2013 NY Slip Op 01546 (1st Dept. 2013) “At this pre-arbitration stage, the issue is not
Alev Med. Supply, Inc. v Allstate Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co., 2012 NY Slip Op 51294(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2012) Since each medical provider as assignee
Matter of Matter of Philadelphia Ins. Co. (Utica Natl. Ins. Group), 2012 NY Slip Op 05470 (4th Dept. 2012) This is a coverage case with a
Siegel v Landy, 2012 NY Slip Op 03625 (2d Dept. 2012) There is a right to be able to present evidence at an arbitration… “However, as
Matter of Mvaic v Interboro Med. Care & Diagnostic PC, 2010 NY Slip Op 04522 (1st Dept. 2010) “MVAIC defended the arbitration on the ground that
Matter of Chin v State Farm Ins. Co., 2010 NY Slip Op 04186 (2d Dept. 2010) “Consistent with the public policy in favor of arbitration, the
Matter of Travelers Indem. Co. v United Diagnostic Imaging, P.C., 2010 NY Slip Op 03944 (2d Dept. 2010) “The test for ordering disclosure to aid in
In UM and SUM arbitration, it has been held that the failure to stay the arbitration within 20-days of the service of an intent to arbitrate
The one thing that we can all say about Second Department practice, whether it be at the Appellate Term or the Appellate Division, is that the
Matter of Progressive Northeastern Ins. Co. v Seaport Orthopedic Assn. 2009 NY Slip Op 31915(U)(Sup Ct NY Co. 2009) In this case, a master arbitrator failed
> In a very interesting case, the Appellate Division, Fourth Department held that principles of collateral estoppel do not apply in arbitration. Matter of Falzone v
The law is simple: Disputes involving whether an insurance carrier in a no-fault coverage dispute is primary, secondary, or tertiary must be resolved through intercompany arbitration.
