ABOUT JASON TENENBAUM, ESQ

The issues Mr. Tenenbaum has tried and appealed are multi-varied and nuanced, both representing insurance companies. They involve the scope of the evidence necessary to prevail on summary judgment motions and trial as to issues of causation, medical appropriateness of the rendered services, fee schedule adherence and proof required to prima facie prove a staged loss on motion. On a more nuanced level, Mr. Tenenbaum successfully challenged at the Appellate Divisions arbitrator’s failure to consider AMA guidance in ascertaining the reimbursable amount for services, arbitrators’ adherence to the rules of evidence when the rules are significantly relaxed at an arbitration, the failure of arbitrators’ to consider evidence as to the relatedness of medical equipment to an injury and the failure of arbitrators’ to follow defined precedent involving policy based defenses.

Mr. Tenenbaum in his role as a Plaintiff attorney convinced the Appellate Division that an injured person who pays their medical billings has standing to prosecute their claim for denied medical benefits against an insurance company, notwithstanding the execution of an assignment of benefits that transferred that right to the medical provider. He also convinced the Appellate Division that an attorney fee is required for all work performed in moving to confirm a no-fault master arbitration award.