Skip to main content
The powers of a court to vacate an arbitration award
Arbitrations

The powers of a court to vacate an arbitration award

By Jason Tenenbaum 8 min read

Key Takeaway

Learn about court powers to vacate arbitration awards in NY no-fault insurance cases. Key legal standards and real case analysis from Miller v Elrac.

Matter of Miller v Elrac, LLC, 2019 NY Slip Op 01544 (1st Dept. 2019)

(1) ”  Since the master arbitrator found that the no-fault arbitrator reached the decision in a rational manner and that the decision was not arbitrary or capricious, incorrect as a matter of law, in excess of policy limits, or in conflict with other no-fault arbitration proceedings there were no grounds for its vacatur; the motion court correctly upheld the master arbitrator’s determination “

(2) “Contrary to petitioner’s argument, there is no basis to conclude that the arbitrator made a mistake of law by ignoring whether petitioner’s condition could have worsened after respondent’s independent medical examination; she just made a factual determination that it had not “

My only comment on this case is that the lower arbitrator made two significant mistakes. First, the arbitrator said that Petitioner should lose because of a “gap in treatment”. Besides gaps in treatment having no applicability outside Ins Law 5102(d) motions, Petitioner suffered a fracture. Second, the Petitioner developed a tumor on the finger that broke and his condition declined subsequently. The lower arbitrator looked at all records until the one where the tumor arose. The record is clear.

Anyway, arbitration can be just that: arbitrary.


Legal Update (February 2026): Since this post’s publication in 2019, New York Insurance Law Section 5102 and related no-fault arbitration procedures may have been subject to regulatory amendments or interpretive guidance updates. Additionally, case law interpreting the standards for vacating arbitration awards in no-fault insurance disputes has continued to develop. Practitioners should verify current statutory provisions and recent appellate decisions when advising on arbitration vacatur standards.

Filed under: Arbitrations
Jason Tenenbaum, Personal Injury Attorney serving Long Island, Nassau County and Suffolk County

About the Author

Jason Tenenbaum

Jason Tenenbaum is a personal injury attorney serving Long Island, Nassau & Suffolk Counties, and New York City. Admitted to practice in NY, NJ, FL, TX, GA, MI, and Federal courts, Jason is one of the few attorneys who writes his own appeals and tries his own cases. Since 2002, he has authored over 2,353 articles on no-fault insurance law, personal injury, and employment law — a resource other attorneys rely on to stay current on New York appellate decisions.

Education
Syracuse University College of Law
Experience
24+ Years
Articles
2,353+ Published
Licensed In
7 States + Federal

Discussion

Comments (1)

Archived from the original blog discussion.

FT
First Things First
This doesn’t seem like the standard of review as contemplated by Mt. Saint Mary’s way back when, but something of an empty reference to “arbitrary and capricious” without any real application thereof. On the other hand though, it was interesting to observe “in excess of policy limits” specifically cited as a basis for vacatur of a no-fault arbitration award, albeit not here.

Long Island Legal Services

Explore Related Practice Areas

Free Consultation — No Upfront Fees

Injured on Long Island?
We Fight for What You Deserve.

Serving Nassau County, Suffolk County, and all of New York City. You pay nothing unless we win.

Available 24/7  ·  No fees unless you win  ·  Serving Long Island & NYC

Injured? Don't Wait.

Get Your Free Case Evaluation Today

No fees unless we win — available 24/7 for emergencies.