Acupuncture Approach, P.C. v Tri State Consumer Ins. Co., 2017 NY Slip Op 51170(U)(App. Term 1st Dept. 2017) The long-failed out of scope defense, well has
Acupuncture Approach, P.C. v Tri State Consumer Ins. Co., 2017 NY Slip Op 51170(U)(App. Term 1st Dept. 2017) The long-failed out of scope defense, well has
Culex Acupuncture, P.C. v 21st Century Indem. Ins. Co., 2017 NY Slip Op 51145(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2017) “Plaintiff’s sole argument on appeal, that the aforesaid
Renelique v Allstate Ins. Co., 2017 NY Slip Op 51141(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2017) “Contrary to plaintiff’s argument, defendant demonstrated that it had properly applied the
Maiga Prods. Corp. v United Servs. Auto. Assn., 2017 NY Slip Op 51148(U) Interestingly, there was no discussion in this case relative to an offer of
K.O. Med., P.C. v Mercury Cas. Co., 2017 NY Slip Op 51158(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2017) I reviewed the papers. The IME vendor changed the affidavit
Eastman v Nash, 2017 NY Slip Op 06523 (2d Dept. 2017) This is any defense attorney’s nigthmare. Losing on a bulge under the significant limitation and