Skip to main content
Another EUO bonanza
EUO issues

Another EUO bonanza

By Jason Tenenbaum 8 min read

Key Takeaway

J.K.M. Med. Care v Ameriprise: Court rules on EUO scheduling requirements, malpractice implications, and assignment timing in New York no-fault insurance case.

J.K.M. Med. Care, P.C. v Ameriprise Ins. Co., 2016 NY Slip Op 26424 (App. Term 2d Dept. 2016)

(1)  “Plaintiff herein was neither named nor served in the Supreme Court proceeding, nor, at the time, was plaintiff in privity with its assignor, who was a named party in that proceeding, as the assignment of benefits had been executed before defendant had commenced the Supreme Court proceeding to compel the assignor’s appearance at an EUO or for declaratory relief upon the assignor’s failure to appear. As plaintiff had no full and fair opportunity to appear and defend its interests in the Supreme Court proceeding, the present action in the Civil Court is not subject to summary judgment dismissing the complaint by virtue of the Supreme Court declaration”

(2) “Defendant argues that, even in the absence of a judicial declaration, the order granting defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint should be affirmed on the alternative ground that plaintiff’s assignor had failed to appear for duly scheduled EUOs. However, contrary to defendant’s assertion, defendant failed to establish that it had timely and properly mailed its EUO scheduling letters”

(3)  “Furthermore, plaintiff properly argues that the scheduling letters failed to advise the assignor, in accordance with 11 NYCRR 65-3.5 (e), that she would be reimbursed for any loss of earnings and reasonable transportation costs incurred in complying with the request for an EUO.”

When do the malpractice insurance carriers get called?  This is not going to be a “U” or “A” citation, so names will appear on this order in the report.  Yikes.


Legal Update (February 2026): Since this post’s publication in December 2016, Part 65 regulations governing no-fault insurance practices, including EUO scheduling requirements under 11 NYCRR 65-3.5, may have been amended or updated. Practitioners should verify current regulatory provisions regarding EUO notice requirements, reimbursement obligations, and procedural compliance standards, as regulatory changes could affect the analysis of proper EUO scheduling discussed in this decision.

Filed under: EUO issues
Jason Tenenbaum, Personal Injury Attorney serving Long Island, Nassau County and Suffolk County

About the Author

Jason Tenenbaum

Jason Tenenbaum is a personal injury attorney serving Long Island, Nassau & Suffolk Counties, and New York City. Admitted to practice in NY, NJ, FL, TX, GA, MI, and Federal courts, Jason is one of the few attorneys who writes his own appeals and tries his own cases. Since 2002, he has authored over 2,353 articles on no-fault insurance law, personal injury, and employment law — a resource other attorneys rely on to stay current on New York appellate decisions.

Education
Syracuse University College of Law
Experience
24+ Years
Articles
2,353+ Published
Licensed In
7 States + Federal

Discussion

Comments (3)

Archived from the original blog discussion.

S
Sun
Second appellate determination in last couple of months finding IME notices defective pursuant to 11 NYCRR 65-3.5(e). Plaintiffs’ counsel should be checking the language carefully because one or more major insurers have taken liberties.
J
jtlawadmin Author
The level of carelessness and the abysmal state of law this firm has made really gets to me.
BT
Bruno Tucker
In the words of Dan Aykroyd – JT you ignorant $lut. I guess what the court and you are saying is any bargain basement EIP can get away with making claims against carriers. Plus while on my crusade my meter is running Any reading of the regulations shows that the carrier can schedule IME’s/EUO’s anywhere, anytime and through whatever means I want. I once scheduled an EUO of a provider using only my mind. No one complained.

Long Island Legal Services

Explore Related Practice Areas

Free Consultation — No Upfront Fees

Injured on Long Island?
We Fight for What You Deserve.

Serving Nassau County, Suffolk County, and all of New York City. You pay nothing unless we win.

Available 24/7  ·  No fees unless you win  ·  Serving Long Island & NYC

Injured? Don't Wait.

Get Your Free Case Evaluation Today

No fees unless we win — available 24/7 for emergencies.