Skip to main content
Putting the cart before the horse?
Affidavits

Putting the cart before the horse?

By Jason Tenenbaum 8 min read

Key Takeaway

Court rejects insurance defense motion due to improper notarization where notary signature preceded the affiant's signature, highlighting critical procedural requirements.

Technical Defects in Affidavits Can Derail Insurance Defense Strategies

In no-fault insurance litigation, insurance companies frequently rely on affidavits to establish defenses, particularly when claiming that an injured party failed to appear for scheduled independent medical examinations (IMEs). However, even seemingly minor technical defects in these sworn statements can prove fatal to an insurer’s case, as demonstrated in a recent Appellate Term decision that highlights the importance of proper notarization procedures.

The case serves as a reminder that courts scrutinize affidavits carefully, and defective notarization can undermine even strong substantive arguments. When procedural requirements aren’t met, the entire foundation of a legal argument may crumble, regardless of the underlying merits.

Jason Tenenbaum’s Analysis:

New Way Acupuncture, P.C. v New York Cent. Mut. Fire Ins. Co., 2016 NY Slip Op 51527(U)(App. Term 2d Dept, 2016)

“Defendant’s motion was properly denied, as defendant failed to establish, as a matter of law, that plaintiff’s assignor had failed to appear for duly scheduled independent medical examinations. Among other things, the affidavit attesting to the second failure to appear indicates, on its face, that it had been notarized before it was signed (see e.g. 97 NY Jur 2d, Summary Judgment, Etc. § 47 ).”

This is an interesting one. The notarization occurred before the signature? I am guessing the affiant’s signature was an original and the notary signature was a photocopy? How was this determined?

Key Takeaway

This decision underscores that procedural compliance in affidavits is just as important as substantive content. Insurance companies must ensure proper notarization sequences, as an affidavit really is not an affidavit when fundamental requirements aren’t met. Even when a second affidavit to clarify is allowed, prevention through careful preparation remains the best strategy.

Filed under: Affidavits
Jason Tenenbaum, Personal Injury Attorney serving Long Island, Nassau County and Suffolk County

About the Author

Jason Tenenbaum

Jason Tenenbaum is a personal injury attorney serving Long Island, Nassau & Suffolk Counties, and New York City. Admitted to practice in NY, NJ, FL, TX, GA, MI, and Federal courts, Jason is one of the few attorneys who writes his own appeals and tries his own cases. Since 2002, he has authored over 2,353 articles on no-fault insurance law, personal injury, and employment law — a resource other attorneys rely on to stay current on New York appellate decisions.

Education
Syracuse University College of Law
Experience
24+ Years
Articles
2,353+ Published
Licensed In
7 States + Federal

Long Island Legal Services

Explore Related Practice Areas

Free Consultation — No Upfront Fees

Injured on Long Island?
We Fight for What You Deserve.

Serving Nassau County, Suffolk County, and all of New York City. You pay nothing unless we win.

Available 24/7  ·  No fees unless you win  ·  Serving Long Island & NYC

Injured? Don't Wait.

Get Your Free Case Evaluation Today

No fees unless we win — available 24/7 for emergencies.