Skip to main content
Maya cannot prove anything is mailed
Mailing

Maya cannot prove anything is mailed

By Jason Tenenbaum 8 min read

Key Takeaway

Maya Insurance Co. loses three no-fault cases due to claims adjuster's contradictory testimony about mailing denial forms before her employment start date.

In no-fault insurance litigation, proving that denial forms were properly mailed is crucial for insurance companies defending against claims. The burden of proof lies with the insurer to demonstrate they sent timely denials to healthcare providers. When this proof fails, insurers face significant legal consequences.

Three recent cases against Maya Assurance Company highlight a fundamental problem in insurance defense: inconsistent witness testimony that undermines the entire defense strategy. These decisions demonstrate how even seemingly minor discrepancies in an affidavit can completely destroy an insurer’s case, particularly when dealing with mailing requirements that courts scrutinize heavily.

The core issue in these cases involves a claims adjuster who claimed to have personally mailed denial forms in May 2012, but then revealed she didn’t begin working for the company until July 2012. This contradiction rendered her testimony worthless and left Maya unable to prove proper mailing occurred.

Jason Tenenbaum’s Analysis:

Great Health Care Chiropractic, P.C. v Maya Assur. Co., 2016 NY Slip Op 50308(U)(App. Term 2d Dept 2016)

Gl Acupuncture, P.C. v Maya Assur. Co., 2016 NY Slip Op 50310(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2016)

Atlantic Radiology, P.C. v Maya Assur. Co., 2016 NY Slip Op 50316(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2016)

“Although the claims adjuster stated that, in May 2012, she had personally generated the denial of claim form and placed it in an envelope, affixed proper postage and placed the envelope in an outgoing mailbox, she also stated that she began working for defendant as a claims adjuster in July 2012. Consequently, her affidavit was of no probative value (see Points of Health Acupuncture, P.C. v GEICO Ins. Co., 25 Misc 3d 140, 2009 NY Slip Op 52445 ).”

Key Takeaway

Insurance companies must ensure their witnesses provide consistent, accurate testimony when proving mailing of denial forms. Even minor contradictions about employment dates can render entire affidavits worthless, leaving insurers unable to meet their burden of proof. This case series underscores the importance of proper documentation and verification procedures in no-fault insurance claims handling.

Filed under: Mailing
Jason Tenenbaum, Personal Injury Attorney serving Long Island, Nassau County and Suffolk County

About the Author

Jason Tenenbaum

Jason Tenenbaum is a personal injury attorney serving Long Island, Nassau & Suffolk Counties, and New York City. Admitted to practice in NY, NJ, FL, TX, GA, MI, and Federal courts, Jason is one of the few attorneys who writes his own appeals and tries his own cases. Since 2002, he has authored over 2,353 articles on no-fault insurance law, personal injury, and employment law — a resource other attorneys rely on to stay current on New York appellate decisions.

Education
Syracuse University College of Law
Experience
24+ Years
Articles
2,353+ Published
Licensed In
7 States + Federal

Long Island Legal Services

Explore Related Practice Areas

Free Consultation — No Upfront Fees

Injured on Long Island?
We Fight for What You Deserve.

Serving Nassau County, Suffolk County, and all of New York City. You pay nothing unless we win.

Available 24/7  ·  No fees unless you win  ·  Serving Long Island & NYC

Injured? Don't Wait.

Get Your Free Case Evaluation Today

No fees unless we win — available 24/7 for emergencies.