Skip to main content
Unsettled order fails to dismiss Civil Court action
collateral estoppel

Unsettled order fails to dismiss Civil Court action

By Jason Tenenbaum 8 min read

Key Takeaway

Court rules that unsettled declaratory judgment order lacks preclusive effect in no-fault insurance litigation when parties' rights aren't clearly declared.

When Declaratory Judgment Orders Fall Short: The Importance of Clear Judicial Determinations

In no-fault insurance litigation, parties often attempt to use prior court orders to block future claims through the legal doctrine of collateral estoppel. However, as demonstrated in a recent Appellate Term decision, not all court orders carry the same legal weight. When a declaratory judgment order fails to clearly state the parties’ rights and obligations, it cannot serve as a shield against subsequent litigation.

This principle becomes particularly important in denial of claims cases, where insurance companies frequently rely on previous court determinations to avoid paying benefits. The quality and specificity of judicial orders can make or break these defensive strategies.

Jason Tenenbaum’s Analysis:

Promed Orthocare Supply, Inc. v AIG Advantage Ins. Co., 2015 NY Slip Op 51886(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2015)

“Upon a review of the record, we find that since the March 2010 Supreme Court order in the declaratory judgment action merely granted the entry of a declaratory judgment, but failed to make a statement declaring the rights of the parties involved (see Hirsch v Lindor Realty Corp., 63 NY2d 878, 881 ; Suburban Bindery Equip. Corp. v Boston Old Colony Ins. Co., 150 AD2d 767 ; Metro Health Prods., Inc. v Nationwide Ins., 48 Misc 3d 85 ), the Supreme Court order cannot be considered a conclusive final determination and, thus, can have no preclusive effect in the instant no-fault action”

You know the order stated: motion granted, settled judgment. Nothing else was decreed. Defendant failed to settle a judgment and this is the result.

Key Takeaway

A declaratory judgment order that merely states “motion granted, settled judgment” without specifically declaring the parties’ rights lacks the finality required for collateral estoppel. This case illustrates why proper settlement of judgments with clear declarations is essential, as incomplete judicial determinations can leave parties vulnerable to subsequent litigation on the same issues.

Jason Tenenbaum, Personal Injury Attorney serving Long Island, Nassau County and Suffolk County

About the Author

Jason Tenenbaum

Jason Tenenbaum is a personal injury attorney serving Long Island, Nassau & Suffolk Counties, and New York City. Admitted to practice in NY, NJ, FL, TX, GA, MI, and Federal courts, Jason is one of the few attorneys who writes his own appeals and tries his own cases. Since 2002, he has authored over 2,353 articles on no-fault insurance law, personal injury, and employment law — a resource other attorneys rely on to stay current on New York appellate decisions.

Education
Syracuse University College of Law
Experience
24+ Years
Articles
2,353+ Published
Licensed In
7 States + Federal

Long Island Legal Services

Explore Related Practice Areas

Free Consultation — No Upfront Fees

Injured on Long Island?
We Fight for What You Deserve.

Serving Nassau County, Suffolk County, and all of New York City. You pay nothing unless we win.

Available 24/7  ·  No fees unless you win  ·  Serving Long Island & NYC

Injured? Don't Wait.

Get Your Free Case Evaluation Today

No fees unless we win — available 24/7 for emergencies.