Skip to main content
IME no-show defense folds
IME issues

IME no-show defense folds

By Jason Tenenbaum 8 min read

Key Takeaway

A simple spelling error in an IME scheduling letter caused an insurance company's no-show defense to collapse, highlighting the importance of accurate patient identification.

In New York no-fault insurance law, insurance companies frequently schedule Independent Medical Examinations (IMEs) to evaluate the extent of a patient’s injuries and medical necessity of ongoing treatment. When patients fail to appear for these examinations, insurers typically use this as grounds to deny claims or seek summary judgment dismissing lawsuits.

However, as this case demonstrates, even seemingly minor administrative errors can have significant consequences for insurance companies’ IME defenses. The accuracy of patient identification in scheduling letters is crucial, as courts require proper notice to establish a valid no-show substantiated defense. This case serves as a reminder that attention to detail in IME procedures can make or break an insurer’s position.

Jason Tenenbaum’s Analysis:

Bay Ls Med. Supplies, Inc. v Chubb Indem. Ins. Co., 2015 NY Slip Op 50790(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2014)

This is the first time I saw a spelling error cause an IME defense to fold. But the error here is significant enough to raise an issue of fact on the issue as to proper notification and a poor case to appeal.

“As it cannot be said, as a matter of law, that the IME scheduling letters addressed to John Canela provided sufficient notice that plaintiff’s assignor, Jhonffi Canela (misspelled “Johnfi” by plaintiff in the summons and complaint), was to appear for the IMEs, the Civil Court properly denied defendant’s cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.”

Key Takeaway

While IME letters do not need to be sent to provider entities, they must accurately identify the patient scheduled for examination. Courts will not grant summary judgment on IME no-show defenses when spelling errors in patient names create questions about whether proper notice was given, even if the misspelling originated in the plaintiff’s own complaint.

Filed under: IME issues
Jason Tenenbaum, Personal Injury Attorney serving Long Island, Nassau County and Suffolk County

About the Author

Jason Tenenbaum

Jason Tenenbaum is a personal injury attorney serving Long Island, Nassau & Suffolk Counties, and New York City. Admitted to practice in NY, NJ, FL, TX, GA, MI, and Federal courts, Jason is one of the few attorneys who writes his own appeals and tries his own cases. Since 2002, he has authored over 2,353 articles on no-fault insurance law, personal injury, and employment law — a resource other attorneys rely on to stay current on New York appellate decisions.

Education
Syracuse University College of Law
Experience
24+ Years
Articles
2,353+ Published
Licensed In
7 States + Federal

Long Island Legal Services

Explore Related Practice Areas

Free Consultation — No Upfront Fees

Injured on Long Island?
We Fight for What You Deserve.

Serving Nassau County, Suffolk County, and all of New York City. You pay nothing unless we win.

Available 24/7  ·  No fees unless you win  ·  Serving Long Island & NYC

Injured? Don't Wait.

Get Your Free Case Evaluation Today

No fees unless we win — available 24/7 for emergencies.