Matter of State of New York v Richard TT., 2015 NY Slip Op 03591 (2d Dept. 2015) “It is well settled that “[n]o appeal lies from
May 4, 2015 No Comments
Matter of State of New York v Richard TT., 2015 NY Slip Op 03591 (2d Dept. 2015) “It is well settled that “[n]o appeal lies from
GMAC Mtge., LLC v Guccione, 2015 NY Slip Op 03500 (2d Dept. 2015) “On September 19, 2011, the Supreme Court, on the record, directed the dismissal
Washington Mut. Bank v Murphy, 2015 NY Slip Op 03520 (2d Dept. 2015) (1) “According to the affidavit of service, a copy of the summons and
Progressive Cas. Ins. Co. v Infinite Ortho Prods., Inc., 2015 NY Slip Op 03340 (2d Dept. 2015) Assuming this is the standard affidavit, problems have arisen
Robles v Polytemp, Inc., 2015 NY Slip Op 03341 (2d Dept. 2015) “The plaintiff contends that the Supreme Court erred in denying his request, made at
Alli v Full Serv. Auto Repair, LLC, 2015 NY Slip Op 03308 (2d Dept. 2015) The missing witness charge “The plaintiff requested that the Supreme Court
Portfolio Recovery Assoc., LLC v Lall, 2015 NY Slip Op 03284 (1st Dept. 2015) For anyone who is worried about what a reversal of Vivanne Etienne
Matter of Alam v Motor Veh. Acc. Indem. Corp., 2015 NY Slip Op 03298 (1st Dept. 2015) “Petitioner was injured after being struck by a vehicle
“Where a demand to change venue claiming the designation of an improper county is opposed by a plaintiff, any subsequent motion to transfer venue must
Quality Psychological Servs. v Infinity Prop. & Cas. Co., 2015 NY Slip Op 50645(U)(App. Term 1st Dept. 2015) “While defendant-insurer submitted proof indicating that it properly
Orthopedic Specialist of Greater NY v Chubb Indem. Ins. Co., 2015 NY Slip Op 50565(U) (1) “We agree that the conflicting medical expert opinions adduced by
Edison Med. Servs., P.C. v Clarendon Natl. Ins. Co., 2015 NY Slip Op 50479(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2015) “CPLR 3215 (c) requires that a plaintiff commence
VE Med. Care, P.C. v State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 2015 NY Slip Op 50603(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2015) “Defendant’s motion should have been denied,
