Skip to main content
Failure to provide proof of Medicare status kills post-verdict interest
4404(a) & weight of evidence review

Failure to provide proof of Medicare status kills post-verdict interest

By Jason Tenenbaum 8 min read

Key Takeaway

Court vacates post-verdict interest when plaintiff fails to provide Medicare status affidavit required under CPLR 5003-a for defendant's federal reporting compliance.

Personal injury cases don’t end when a jury renders a verdict. Post-verdict procedural requirements can significantly impact the final resolution, particularly when federal regulations intersect with state law. One critical requirement involves Medicare reporting obligations that defendants must satisfy after obtaining a judgment.

In Torres v Visto Realty Corp., the First Department addressed what happens when a plaintiff fails to cooperate with these post-verdict requirements. The case demonstrates how seemingly administrative obligations can have substantial financial consequences, including the loss of accrued interest on a judgment.

Jason Tenenbaum’s Analysis:

Torres v Visto Realty Corp., 2015 NY Slip Op 03255 (1st Dept. 2015)

“Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Lizbeth Gonzalez, J.), entered April 4, 2014, which upon defendant’s motion, vacated the portions of the judgment, same court and Justice, entered November 21, 2013, awarding plaintiff interest, costs, and disbursements, and attorneys’ fees, if any, as calculated in the judgment, vacated all future interests, costs, disbursements, and attorneys’ fees, if any, accrued after entry of the judgment, ordered that no further interest, costs, disbursements and attorneys’ fees, if any, are to accrue, ordered plaintiff’s counsel to provide a Satisfaction of Judgment to defendant’s counsel and file an amended or modified judgment in the amount of $200,000 within 20 days, and ordered plaintiff to provide an affidavit that he is not and was not a Medicare recipient at the time of the accident within 30 days, unanimously affirmed, without costs.”

“Contrary to plaintiff’s contention, the court properly found that plaintiff did not satisfy his obligations under CPLR 5003-a, since he failed to provide defendant with the information relating to his Medicare status that defendant requires to comply with its reporting obligations under 42 USC § 1395y”

Key Takeaway

CPLR 5003-a requires plaintiffs to provide Medicare status information to defendants for federal reporting compliance. Failure to provide this information can result in the vacation of post-verdict interest, costs, and attorney’s fees. This case underscores the importance of completing all post-verdict procedural requirements, as even high-value personal injury settlements can be affected by administrative non-compliance.

Jason Tenenbaum, Personal Injury Attorney serving Long Island, Nassau County and Suffolk County

About the Author

Jason Tenenbaum

Jason Tenenbaum is a personal injury attorney serving Long Island, Nassau & Suffolk Counties, and New York City. Admitted to practice in NY, NJ, FL, TX, GA, MI, and Federal courts, Jason is one of the few attorneys who writes his own appeals and tries his own cases. Since 2002, he has authored over 2,353 articles on no-fault insurance law, personal injury, and employment law — a resource other attorneys rely on to stay current on New York appellate decisions.

Education
Syracuse University College of Law
Experience
24+ Years
Articles
2,353+ Published
Licensed In
7 States + Federal

Long Island Legal Services

Explore Related Practice Areas

Free Consultation — No Upfront Fees

Injured on Long Island?
We Fight for What You Deserve.

Serving Nassau County, Suffolk County, and all of New York City. You pay nothing unless we win.

Available 24/7  ·  No fees unless you win  ·  Serving Long Island & NYC

Injured? Don't Wait.

Get Your Free Case Evaluation Today

No fees unless we win — available 24/7 for emergencies.