11 NYCRR 65-4.6 The following limitations shall apply to the payment by insurers of applicants’ attorney’s fees for services necessarily performed in the resolution of
February 12, 2015 15 Comments
11 NYCRR 65-4.6 The following limitations shall apply to the payment by insurers of applicants’ attorney’s fees for services necessarily performed in the resolution of
People v. Haywood, 2015 N.Y. Slip Op. 00555 (2d Dept. 2015) “The trial court properly precluded the defendant from cross-examining one of the complaining witnesses
American Express Bank FSB v Najieb, 2015 NY Slip Op 01177 (1st Dept. 2015) “The securitization of plaintiff credit card issuer’s receivables did not divest it
Santiago v Valentin, 2015 NY Slip Op 01159 (1st Dept. 2015) “Plaintiff provided an attorney’s affirmation describing that the failure to submit opposition was due to
De Sanchez v Trevz Trucking LLC, 2015 NY Slip Op 00622 (1st Dept. 2015) “Under the circumstances, including that defendants’ orthopedic expert addressed all of plaintiff’s
Seck v Serrano, 2015 NY Slip Op 00596 (1st Dept. 2015) “We note that the order was not a conditional, “self-executing” order, which required discovery to
Mejia v Ramos, 2015 NY Slip Op 00311 (1st Dept. 2015) To the extent plaintiff contends the [surgical] report itself found abnormalities in the knee, such
