Skip to main content
Follow the NF-5
Additional Verification

Follow the NF-5

By Jason Tenenbaum 8 min read

Key Takeaway

Mount Sinai v Dust Tr. case analysis: verification requests sent before receiving NF-5 forms don't toll the 30-day payment period under NY no-fault law.

Mount Sinai Hosp. v Dust Tr., Inc., 2014 NY Slip Op 03667 (2d Dept. 2014)

“contrary to the defendant’s contention, this action is not premature, and the 30-day period in which the defendant must pay or deny the claim has not been indefinitely tolled. “; request for verification that precedes a no-fault insurer’s receipt of the prescribed N-F 5 claim form does not trigger the tolling of the 30-day period within which an insurer must determine whether to pay or deny such a claim” (Sound Shore Med. Ctr. v New York Cent. Mut. Fire Ins. Co., 106 AD3d 157, 164). Here, the defendant sent two letters requesting verification, one dated March 15, 2010, and another dated April 15, 2010. The defendant’s verification request dated March 15, 2010, was sent after the defendant received an “interim bill” from the plaintiff, which was sent solely for the purpose of notifying the defendant of the claim, and preceded the defendant’s receipt of the N-F 5 form. Thus, the March 15, 2010, verification request did not trigger the tolling of the 30-day period within which an insurer must determine whether to pay or deny the claim. Consequently, the only effective request for verification was the one dated April 15, 2010, six days after the defendant’s receipt of the plaintiff’s N-F 5 form (see id.).”

This is the ultimate in form over substance.  Strangely, the carrier that receives the UB-04 prior to NF-5 gets penalized for reacting to the UB-04 while implicitly ignoring the NF-5


Legal Update (February 2026): The procedural requirements and timing provisions for no-fault verification requests discussed in this 2014 post may have been modified through subsequent regulatory amendments or Department of Financial Services updates. Practitioners should verify current N-F 5 form requirements and tolling provisions under 11 NYCRR 65, as verification procedures and associated time periods are subject to periodic regulatory revision.

Jason Tenenbaum, Personal Injury Attorney serving Long Island, Nassau County and Suffolk County

About the Author

Jason Tenenbaum

Jason Tenenbaum is a personal injury attorney serving Long Island, Nassau & Suffolk Counties, and New York City. Admitted to practice in NY, NJ, FL, TX, GA, MI, and Federal courts, Jason is one of the few attorneys who writes his own appeals and tries his own cases. Since 2002, he has authored over 2,353 articles on no-fault insurance law, personal injury, and employment law — a resource other attorneys rely on to stay current on New York appellate decisions.

Education
Syracuse University College of Law
Experience
24+ Years
Articles
2,353+ Published
Licensed In
7 States + Federal

Long Island Legal Services

Explore Related Practice Areas

Free Consultation — No Upfront Fees

Injured on Long Island?
We Fight for What You Deserve.

Serving Nassau County, Suffolk County, and all of New York City. You pay nothing unless we win.

Available 24/7  ·  No fees unless you win  ·  Serving Long Island & NYC

Injured? Don't Wait.

Get Your Free Case Evaluation Today

No fees unless we win — available 24/7 for emergencies.