Skip to main content
The 60-day rule that was never published in the law journal
Procedural Issues

The 60-day rule that was never published in the law journal

By Jason Tenenbaum 8 min read

Key Takeaway

Court applies unpublished 60-day summary judgment rule in Civil Court case, raising procedural questions about timing limits and Second Department review needed.

Tong Li v Citiwide Auto Leasing, Inc., 2014 NY Slip Op 50481(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2014)

“It is undisputed that, under the rules of Part 41 of the Civil Court, motions for summary judgment are to be filed within 60 days of the filing of the notice of trial. It is also undisputed that defendant filed its motion in Part 41 more than 60 days after the notice of trial had been filed.”

Why does this Court apply 3212(a) to Civil Court matters?  It deals with Notes of Issue, not the notice of trial.  CPLR 3404 deals with Supreme Court and Count Court actions and the Second Department held that the statute does not apply to Civil Court practice as noted in Chavez.  Yet, the Appellate Term clearly noted prior to Chavez that the uniform court rules apply to CPLR 3404.  Also, absent a provision in a compliance conference order or preliminary conference order which limits the time to make a dispositive motion, who has the right to limit the 120 day period in a court where a Notice of Trial can be filed at any time?   Also, this rule is not in the law journal or on a website. It is a poor holding.  This is another case where the Second Department should really look at this issue.


Legal Update (February 2026): Since this 2014 post, Civil Court rules regarding summary judgment timing may have been revised, and the interaction between CPLR 3212(a) and Civil Court Part 41 procedures may have been further clarified through subsequent appellate decisions. Additionally, uniform court rules and local administrative orders governing motion practice deadlines are subject to periodic amendment. Practitioners should verify current Civil Court rules and recent case law addressing the 60-day summary judgment filing requirement in Civil Court matters.

Jason Tenenbaum, Personal Injury Attorney serving Long Island, Nassau County and Suffolk County

About the Author

Jason Tenenbaum

Jason Tenenbaum is a personal injury attorney serving Long Island, Nassau & Suffolk Counties, and New York City. Admitted to practice in NY, NJ, FL, TX, GA, MI, and Federal courts, Jason is one of the few attorneys who writes his own appeals and tries his own cases. Since 2002, he has authored over 2,353 articles on no-fault insurance law, personal injury, and employment law — a resource other attorneys rely on to stay current on New York appellate decisions.

Education
Syracuse University College of Law
Experience
24+ Years
Articles
2,353+ Published
Licensed In
7 States + Federal

Discussion

Comments (1)

Archived from the original blog discussion.

JT
Jason Tenenbaum Author
CPLR 3212(a) applies to the Civil Court due to New York City Civil Court Act §§ 1001 and 2102. The reason that CPLR 3404 does not apply to the Civil Court is not because it deals with Notes of Issue instead of Notices of Trial. In fact, the phrase “Note of Issue” appears nowhere in CPLR 3404. Instead, the reason that CPLR 3404 does not apply in Civil Court is because it conflicts with the Uniform Rules for the New York City Civil Court at 22 NYCRR § 208.14(c). See Chavez v 407 Seventh Ave. Corp., 39 AD3d 454 (2d Dept 2007).

Long Island Legal Services

Explore Related Practice Areas

Free Consultation — No Upfront Fees

Injured on Long Island?
We Fight for What You Deserve.

Serving Nassau County, Suffolk County, and all of New York City. You pay nothing unless we win.

Available 24/7  ·  No fees unless you win  ·  Serving Long Island & NYC

Injured? Don't Wait.

Get Your Free Case Evaluation Today

No fees unless we win — available 24/7 for emergencies.