Skip to main content
Six year statute of limitations period governed by how the complaint is pleaded
Statute of Limitations

Six year statute of limitations period governed by how the complaint is pleaded

By Jason Tenenbaum 8 min read

Key Takeaway

NY Court rules on six-year statute of limitations for no-fault claims based on complaint pleading requirements and when causes of action accrue.

Wexford Med., P.C. v Commerce Ins. Co., 2013 NY Slip Op 51193(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2013)

“The complaint alleges that “health services” were rendered to the assignor on January 9, 2003, that a bill for such services was “timely received” by defendant insurer, and that defendant failed to properly deny the bill within 30 days or request additional verification. Inasmuch as plaintiff was required to submit the proof of claim no later than 45 days after the services were rendered (see 11 NYCRR 65-1.1; New York & Presbyt. Hosp. v Country-Wide Ins. Co., 17 NY3d 586, 589-590 ), and the claim accrued 30 days thereafter (see Matter of Travelers Indem. Co. of Conn. v Glenwood Med., P.C., 48 AD3d 319 ), this action, commenced on September 18, 2009, is barred by the governing six-year statute of limitations”

By the way, if this was an endorsed complaint, would the pleader be non-suited without the movant providing evidence that the bills themselves were “received” and that thirty days elapsed?

Or what happens if a bill is denied prior to the 30-day deadline to adjust a bill?  The Courts have held that this is what starts the SOL clock:

New York Med. Rehab., P.C. v Travelers Ins. Co., 2013 NY Slip Op 23218 (App. Term 2d Dept. 2013)

“A defendant asserting a statute of limitations defense must establish that the plaintiff commenced the action after the expiration of the statute of limitations. A no-fault cause of action accrues when payment of no-fault benefits becomes “overdue” (see Insurance Law § 5106 ; see also Matter of Travelers Indem. Co. of Conn. v Glenwood Med., P.C., 48 AD3d 319, 320 ; Mandarino v Travelers Prop. Cas. Ins. Co., 37 AD3d 775 ; Acupuncture Works, P.C. v MVAIC, 27 Misc 3d 131, 2010 NY Slip Op 50646 ). For statute of limitations purposes, plaintiff’s claim accrued on January 14, 2003, the date that defendant issued and mailed its denial of claim form”


Legal Update (February 2026): Since this 2013 post, the no-fault regulations at 11 NYCRR Part 65 have undergone significant amendments, including updates to claim submission deadlines, verification procedures, and statute of limitations accrual provisions. Additionally, subsequent appellate decisions may have refined the pleading standards for statute of limitations defenses in no-fault actions, and practitioners should verify current regulatory provisions and case law developments when analyzing limitation periods.

Jason Tenenbaum, Personal Injury Attorney serving Long Island, Nassau County and Suffolk County

About the Author

Jason Tenenbaum

Jason Tenenbaum is a personal injury attorney serving Long Island, Nassau & Suffolk Counties, and New York City. Admitted to practice in NY, NJ, FL, TX, GA, MI, and Federal courts, Jason is one of the few attorneys who writes his own appeals and tries his own cases. Since 2002, he has authored over 2,353 articles on no-fault insurance law, personal injury, and employment law — a resource other attorneys rely on to stay current on New York appellate decisions.

Education
Syracuse University College of Law
Experience
24+ Years
Articles
2,353+ Published
Licensed In
7 States + Federal

Long Island Legal Services

Explore Related Practice Areas

Free Consultation — No Upfront Fees

Injured on Long Island?
We Fight for What You Deserve.

Serving Nassau County, Suffolk County, and all of New York City. You pay nothing unless we win.

Available 24/7  ·  No fees unless you win  ·  Serving Long Island & NYC

Injured? Don't Wait.

Get Your Free Case Evaluation Today

No fees unless we win — available 24/7 for emergencies.