Key Takeaway
New York court ruling on proving non-receipt of mailed documents in no-fault insurance cases, establishing standards for rebutting mailing presumptions.
Matter of Matter of Government Empls. Ins. Co. v Morris, 2012 NY Slip Op 03448 (2d Dept. 2012).
I would seriously take notice of this case. This is probably the standard to prove non-receipt, both in a traverse setting and in the usual mailing battles that no-fault fosters.
“As a general rule of evidence, proof that an item was properly mailed gives rise to a rebuttable presumption that the item was received by the addressee” (Matter of Rodriguez v Wing, 251 AD2d 335, 336 ). Here, the appellant adduced evidence at the hearing that gave rise to a rebuttable presumption that the November 3, 2009, letter was duly received by GEICO (see Badio v Liberty Mut. Fire Ins. Co., 12 AD3d 229). However, GEICO rebutted this presumption by presenting evidence demonstrating its “regular practices and procedures in retrieving, opening, and indexing its mail and in maintaining its files on existing claims” (Liriano v Eveready Ins. Co., 65 AD3d 524, 525; see Electronic Servs. Intl. v Silvers, 233 AD2d 361). In addition, to the extent that the conclusion of the Supreme Court was based upon credibility determinations, such determinations are entitled to deference on appeal (see Matter of Allstate Ins. Co. v Albino, 16 AD3d 682, 683; Contarino v North Shore Univ. Hosp. at Glen Cove, 13 AD3d 571).”
| er of Government Empls. Ins. Co. v Morris |
| 2012 NY Slip Op 03448 |
Related Articles
- Understanding No-Fault Insurance Mailing Requirements: Lessons from the First Department’s “Venom” Decision”
- The Usual Mailing Arguments Have Fallen on Deaf Ears (Again): When Courts Reject Technical Challenges
- Claims documents considered as business records and unsuccessful mailing challenge
- Understanding Verification Requests in New York No-Fault Insurance Claims
- New York No-Fault Insurance Law
