Hazzard v Burrowes, 2012 NY Slip Op 03409 (2d Dept. 2012)
“Moreover, the police accident report was inadmissible, as it was not certified as a business record (see CPLR 4518(a)), and the statements by both the appellant and Burrowes were self-serving, did not fall within any exception to the hearsay rule, and bore upon the ultimate issues of fact to be decided by the jury”
4518(a) v. 4518 (c) ?
2 Responses
J.T. I hate to slightly stray from the topic but it has come to my attention that I have done a grave injustice to certain dedicated individuals. I wish to make amends by suggesting a manner in which they can earn more money as they are severely underpaid for their hard and most needed work.
Yes I am apologizing to IME Medical Professionals. I have been wrong about them and wish to make my apology public. They are good people who strive for truth and excellence as well as a healthy citizen.
So here is my idea which should make it up to them somewhat.
IUA.
That’s right — IUA
IME Under Anesthesia
Hey the money is huge. The patient is scared to death at the IME. One look at the examiner would scare even me. So it is needed.
Plus you would have to film it to disprove false allegations of impropriety on the part of the IME examiner such as theft; assault; unwanted fondling; etc and worse.
The filming brings in more money and the IME Doc can take a piece of the filming revenue — no Stark Laws against that.
These people can finally be justly compensated for their courageous work.
Just a thought. And why not?
I hope you have the courage to post this so that these IME Docs can finally get their just desserts.
Zuppa
courage or insanity? Perhaps anything under anesthesia is better?