Skip to main content
4518(a) deals with certification?
Business records

4518(a) deals with certification?

By Jason Tenenbaum 8 min read

Key Takeaway

Court ruling clarifies CPLR 4518(a) certification requirements for police accident reports as business records in New York personal injury cases.

The admissibility of police accident reports in New York personal injury litigation hinges on strict procedural requirements under the Civil Practice Law and Rules (CPLR). Section 4518 governs the admission of business records, which can be crucial evidence in motor vehicle accident cases. However, courts consistently reject improperly authenticated documents, even official police reports.

CPLR 4518 contains multiple subsections with distinct certification requirements. Subsection (a) requires specific foundational elements for business records, including proper certification by the record custodian. This differs from subsection (c), which addresses records kept in the regular course of business. Understanding these distinctions is critical for practitioners seeking to admit documentary evidence.

The Hazzard v. Burrowes decision demonstrates how courts strictly enforce these evidentiary rules. When police reports lack proper certification, they become inadmissible hearsay, potentially undermining a party’s case. This ruling aligns with other New York decisions that have challenged 4518(a) requirements, emphasizing the importance of proper authentication procedures.

Jason Tenenbaum’s Analysis:

Hazzard v Burrowes, 2012 NY Slip Op 03409 (2d Dept. 2012)

“Moreover, the police accident report was inadmissible, as it was not certified as a business record (see CPLR 4518(a)), and the statements by both the appellant and Burrowes were self-serving, did not fall within any exception to the hearsay rule, and bore upon the ultimate issues of fact to be decided by the jury”

4518(a) v. 4518 (c) ?

Key Takeaway

The Hazzard decision underscores that police accident reports require proper certification under CPLR 4518(a) to be admissible as business records. Jason’s notation about comparing subsections (a) and (c) highlights an important distinction practitioners must understand when authenticating documentary evidence in personal injury cases.


Legal Update (February 2026): Since this 2012 post, CPLR 4518 has undergone several amendments affecting business records certification requirements, and New York courts have issued additional precedential decisions interpreting subsection (a) authentication standards. Practitioners should verify current statutory language and recent case law developments regarding police report admissibility and certification procedures.

Jason Tenenbaum, Personal Injury Attorney serving Long Island, Nassau County and Suffolk County

About the Author

Jason Tenenbaum

Jason Tenenbaum is a personal injury attorney serving Long Island, Nassau & Suffolk Counties, and New York City. Admitted to practice in NY, NJ, FL, TX, GA, MI, and Federal courts, Jason is one of the few attorneys who writes his own appeals and tries his own cases. Since 2002, he has authored over 2,353 articles on no-fault insurance law, personal injury, and employment law — a resource other attorneys rely on to stay current on New York appellate decisions.

Education
Syracuse University College of Law
Experience
24+ Years
Articles
2,353+ Published
Licensed In
7 States + Federal

Discussion

Comments (2)

Archived from the original blog discussion.

RZ
Raymond Zuppa
J.T. I hate to slightly stray from the topic but it has come to my attention that I have done a grave injustice to certain dedicated individuals. I wish to make amends by suggesting a manner in which they can earn more money as they are severely underpaid for their hard and most needed work. Yes I am apologizing to IME Medical Professionals. I have been wrong about them and wish to make my apology public. They are good people who strive for truth and excellence as well as a healthy citizen. So here is my idea which should make it up to them somewhat. IUA. That’s right — IUA IME Under Anesthesia Hey the money is huge. The patient is scared to death at the IME. One look at the examiner would scare even me. So it is needed. Plus you would have to film it to disprove false allegations of impropriety on the part of the IME examiner such as theft; assault; unwanted fondling; etc and worse. The filming brings in more money and the IME Doc can take a piece of the filming revenue — no Stark Laws against that. These people can finally be justly compensated for their courageous work. Just a thought. And why not? I hope you have the courage to post this so that these IME Docs can finally get their just desserts. Zuppa
J
JT Author
courage or insanity? Perhaps anything under anesthesia is better?

Long Island Legal Services

Explore Related Practice Areas

Free Consultation — No Upfront Fees

Injured on Long Island?
We Fight for What You Deserve.

Serving Nassau County, Suffolk County, and all of New York City. You pay nothing unless we win.

Available 24/7  ·  No fees unless you win  ·  Serving Long Island & NYC

Injured? Don't Wait.

Get Your Free Case Evaluation Today

No fees unless we win — available 24/7 for emergencies.