People v Grennon (Scott), 2011 NY Slip Op 21265 (App. Term 2d Dept. 2011)
In this case, Defendant beat a 0.19% reading and convinced the Appellate Term that traveling at 30-35 mph over the speed limit, combined with indicia of alcohol consumption was insufficient to prove a common-law DWI charge. Very interesting.
This is a case that belongs in the New York Post.
At the Law Office of Jason Tenenbaum, our attorneys have the integrity and experience you need to best assist, advise, and support you through your legal challenge, every step of the way.
Using cutting-edge technology and strategy to solve complicated problems.
We can fight for your pain and suffering, lost income, medical bills, and any future lost wages.
You have the right to bring a malpractice claim for your medical expenses, lost income and pain and suffering.
If you have been sued for an unpaid consumer loan, fallen behind on your credit card bills or similar.
We can help when you are faced with commercial litigation issues.
We work hard to fight for your individual case and rights, while providing superior legal services on a timely, effective, and efficient basis.
Proin rhoncus metus aliquet blandit ad placerat sociosqu erat vel letius scelerisque taciti pulvinar.
Proin rhoncus metus aliquet blandit ad placerat sociosqu erat vel letius scelerisque taciti pulvinar.
5 Responses
You would have beat the speeding charge as well as the Intoxifation charge JT. Bad lawyering all around. If only this guy Gannon read the NY Post instead of the NY Times.
I mean the NY Times instead of the NY Post.
The power of the insurance industry means insurance companies do not have to honor their contractual agreements to pay benefits.
The power of the alcohol lobby will lead to the legalization of drunk driving.
Mark my words you heard it on the Pit … I mean the Defender.
I find no joy in drunk drivers being acquitted, nor in the acquittal of anyone who appears to have actually committed a crime. No lecture about the State’s burden is required; I know all about it.
“nor in the acquittal of anyone who appears to have actually committed a crime.”
“appears”
I was right in considering you and the rest of the neocon teabaggers as stupid neanderthals.
Larry you don’t the first thing about politically motivated prosecutions whereas I have seen them and actually been part of them.
Shut up