Skip to main content
Interesting procedural case involing the ability to appeal motions to strike 3101(d) disclosures in advance of trial
Evidence

Interesting procedural case involing the ability to appeal motions to strike 3101(d) disclosures in advance of trial

By Jason Tenenbaum 8 min read

Key Takeaway

NY appellate court rules motions to strike expert witness disclosures are evidentiary rulings not appealable until final judgment, affecting biomechanical engineer testimony.

Balcom v Reither, 2010 NY Slip Op 07701 (2d Dept. 2010)

“The plaintiffs contend that the Supreme Court erred in granting those branches of the defendants’ motion which were to strike those portions of the plaintiffs’ expert witness disclosure pertaining to a certain biomedical engineer on the grounds that his testimony will be cumulative of other expert testimony proposed by the plaintiffs and that he is not qualified to give the proposed testimony. However, the Supreme Court’s determinations in that regard effectively are evidentiary rulings made in advance of trial on motion papers and thus are not appealable (see Barnes v Paulin, 52 AD3d 754, 755; Hering v Lighthouse 2001, LLC, 21 AD3d 449, 451-452; cf. Abramson v Pick Quick Foods, Inc., 56 AD3d 702, 703; King v Gregruss Mgt. Corp., 57 AD3d 851, 852-853; [*2]Navarette v Alexiades, 50 AD3d 869, 870). Contrary to the plaintiffs’ contention, the determinations do not go to the merits of their case or affect a substantial right, and thus they are not appealable”

This comes up a lot involving issues of bio-mechanical engineers.  The court is saying that a motion to strike must wait an appeal of the eventual judgment.  Even assuming you can surpass a motion to strike the 3101(d), biomechanical engineer testimony, especially in no-fault practice, often times fails to yields advantageous results to the carrier.  A & A Dental, P.C. v. State Farm Ins. Co., 19 Misc.3d 135(A)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2008).  See, Bronx Radiology, P.C. v. New York Cent. Mut. Fire Ins. Co., 17 Misc.3d 97 (App. Term 1st Dept. 2007).

Jason Tenenbaum, Personal Injury Attorney serving Long Island, Nassau County and Suffolk County

About the Author

Jason Tenenbaum

Jason Tenenbaum is a personal injury attorney serving Long Island, Nassau & Suffolk Counties, and New York City. Admitted to practice in NY, NJ, FL, TX, GA, MI, and Federal courts, Jason is one of the few attorneys who writes his own appeals and tries his own cases. Since 2002, he has authored over 2,353 articles on no-fault insurance law, personal injury, and employment law — a resource other attorneys rely on to stay current on New York appellate decisions.

Education
Syracuse University College of Law
Experience
24+ Years
Articles
2,353+ Published
Licensed In
7 States + Federal

Long Island Legal Services

Explore Related Practice Areas

Free Consultation — No Upfront Fees

Injured on Long Island?
We Fight for What You Deserve.

Serving Nassau County, Suffolk County, and all of New York City. You pay nothing unless we win.

Available 24/7  ·  No fees unless you win  ·  Serving Long Island & NYC

Injured? Don't Wait.

Get Your Free Case Evaluation Today

No fees unless we win — available 24/7 for emergencies.