Blog

Day: April 23, 2010

And this is why computerized range of motion testing is medically necessary – yet, not admissible.

“Furthermore, the computerized range-of-motion tests referred to in Dr. Dudelzak’s affirmations were not in admissible form because they were not affirmed by someone with personal

April 23, 2010 No Comments

Get In Touch

Practice Areas

Support

About Us

The information provided on this website does not, and is not intended to, constitute legal advice; instead, all information, content, and materials available on this site are for general informational purposes only. Information on this website may not constitute the most up-to-date legal or other information and may not be applicable in your jurisdiction.