Howard v Espinosa, 2010 NY Slip Op 00759 (3d Dept. 2010) This is yet another 5102(d) case. But, there is a line in this case
February 6, 2010 No Comments
Howard v Espinosa, 2010 NY Slip Op 00759 (3d Dept. 2010) This is yet another 5102(d) case. But, there is a line in this case
Hame v Lawson, 2010 NY Slip Op 00811 (2d Dept. 2010) I appealed a similar type of defamation case last year. Horbul v Mercury Ins.
First Aid Occupational Therapy, PLLC v Country-Wide Ins. Co., 2010 NY Slip Op 50149(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2010) Unbundling. I love this word. I discussed
Innovative Chiropractic, P.C. v Progressive Ins. Co., 2010 NY Slip Op 50148(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2010) In another day of firsts, the Appellate Term granted
B.Y., M.D., P.C. v Progressive Cas. Ins. Co., 2010 NY Slip Op 50144(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. [9th & 10th Jud. Dis.]) This case is interesting,
B.Y., M.D., P.C. v Government Empl. Ins. Co., 2010 NY Slip Op 20026 (App. Term 2d Dept. 2010) This case is weird. Why would a
St. Vincent’s Hosp. & Med. Ctr. v Allstate Ins. Co., 2010 NY Slip Op 00668 (2d Dept. 2010) “In support of its cross motion, the
