Causation
Streety v Toure, 2019 NY Slip Op 04487 (1st Dept. 2019) (1) “The report of defendants’ expert emergency medicine physician is sufficient to establish their prima
Streety v Toure, 2019 NY Slip Op 04487 (1st Dept. 2019) (1) “The report of defendants’ expert emergency medicine physician is sufficient to establish their prima
Goldson v Mann, 2019 NY Slip Op 04329 (1st Dept. 2019) ” Defendant failed to meet his prima facie burden of demonstrating that he did not
Valdan Acupuncture, P.C. v 21st Century Advantage Ins. Co., 2019 NY Slip Op 50822(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2019) Defendant also submitted affirmations and affidavits from medical
Preferred Ortho Prods., Inc. v 21st Century Ins. Co., 2019 NY Slip Op 50224(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2019) ” Plaintiff’s sole appellate contention with respect to
Parisien v Maya Assur. Co., 2018 NY Slip Op 50771(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2018) “Plaintiff correctly argues on appeal that the affidavit submitted by defendant in support
Pierre J. Renelique, M.D., P.C. v Park Ins. Co., 2018 NY Slip Op 50780(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2018) “Defendant’s moving papers stated that the IME scheduling letters
Valdan Acupuncture, P.C. v NY Cent. Mut. Fire Ins. Co., 2018 NY Slip Op 50739(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2018) Oh its’s real. “Three of the claims at
Global Liberty Ins. Co. v New Century Acupuncture, P.C., 2018 NY Slip Op 03444 (1st Dept. 2018) “Plaintiff sent an initial IME scheduling letter, and a re-scheduling
Thomas J. Tesi, M.S., D.C., P.C. v Hereford Ins. Co., 2018 NY Slip Op 50252(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2018) “However, contrary to defendant’s further argument, defendant did
Longevity Med. Supply, Inc. v Citiwide Auto Leasing, 2017 NY Slip Op 51880(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2017) “In support of its motion, defendant established that, before
Kolodziejski v Jaskolka, 2017 NY Slip Op 07851 “While there is no restriction in CPLR 3121 limiting the number of examinations to which a party may be
Irina Acupuncture, P.C. v Nationwide Affinity Ins. Co., 2017 NY Slip Op 51461(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2017) “Contrary to defendant’s argument, the Civil Court properly granted the