Key Takeaway
Top 10 arguments about acupuncture fee schedules in NY no-fault insurance law, including court precedent and billing disputes between providers and insurers.
This article is part of our ongoing fee schedule coverage, with 118 published articles analyzing fee schedule issues across New York State. Attorney Jason Tenenbaum brings 24+ years of hands-on experience to this analysis, drawing from his work on more than 1,000 appeals, over 100,000 no-fault cases, and recovery of over $100 million for clients throughout Nassau County, Suffolk County, Queens, Brooklyn, Manhattan, and the Bronx. For personalized legal advice about how these principles apply to your specific situation, contact our Long Island office at (516) 750-0595 for a free consultation.
Here are my top ten favorite arguments about why the chiropractor fee schedule should not be abided by.
-
There is no First Department case on point. Mind you the Court of Appeals in LMK gave the DOI carte blanche to interpret any aspect of no-fault law via opinion letter.
-
The DOI’s opinion is unconstitutional. This one is plainly absurd; and it is even more absurd when the Attorney General is not put on notice that a constitutional argument is being made. I would impose $50 in motion costs each time this place in a motion or affirmation in opposition.
-
I can bill a separate code for each body region a needle is placed.
-
Acupuncturists have a superior educational level to that of chiropractors. Is is that superior that they can bill $100 per acupuncture session?
-
Even the medical rate is too low and summary judgment should be denied.
-
You attached the 2007 fee schedule, even though the services were rendered in 2010. Note – the fee schedule for acupuncture has not changed since the conversion from 97780 to 97810,et. al. in 2004.
-
It is a triable issue of fact because this issue should really go trial.
8 ) You cashed the payment for the partial reimbursement for acupuncture services, yet the denial (which accompanied the check) was never mailed
-
There is no fee schedule, so we can bill what we want.
-
We left the needles in for 20 minutes and therefore can bill for the act of reinsertion.
LVOV Acupuncture, P.C. v Geico Ins. Co., 2011 NY Slip Op 51721(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2011)
Anyway, here is an interesting case that evaluates certain arguments.
“We find that the workers’ compensation fee schedule, which is required by law (see Workers’ Compensation Law § 13) and incorporated by reference into the Insurance Department Regulations (see 11 NYCRR 68.1 ), is “of sufficient authenticity and reliability that it may be given judicial notice” (Kingsbrook Jewish Med. Ctr. v Allstate Ins. Co., 61 AD3d 13, 20 ; see also CPLR 4511 ). Defendant demonstrated that it had fully paid plaintiff for the services billed under codes 97810 and 97811 in accordance with the Official New York Workers’ Compensation Chiropractic Fee Schedule (see Great Wall Acupuncture, P.C. v GEICO Ins. Co., 26 Misc 3d 23 ). Since plaintiff did not object to the fee schedule amount set forth by the defense, nor contest the timely denial of the claims, so much of defendant’s motion as sought summary judgment dismissing the complaint as to these claims is granted.”
Incorporated by reference = I do not need to attach it.
Also, did you see the initial visit, that was upheld in the amount of $160.56? I have a thought about this one…
Related Articles
- NY acupuncture prima facie defense with chiropractor rate limitations
- Licensed acupuncture practitioners limited to chiropractor rates
- Fee schedule defense requirements in no-fault insurance cases
- Civil Court JHO reversing appellate and Court of Appeals holdings
- New York No-Fault Insurance Law
Legal Update (February 2026): Since this 2011 post, New York’s no-fault fee schedules and acupuncture reimbursement regulations have been subject to multiple amendments and updates. Practitioners should verify current fee schedule provisions, billing code requirements, and DOI interpretive guidance, as both regulatory changes and case law developments may have materially altered the landscape discussed in this analysis.
Legal Context
Why This Matters for Your Case
New York law is among the most complex and nuanced in the country, with distinct procedural rules, substantive doctrines, and court systems that differ significantly from other jurisdictions. The Civil Practice Law and Rules (CPLR) governs every stage of civil litigation, from service of process through trial and appeal. The Appellate Division, Appellate Term, and Court of Appeals create a rich and ever-evolving body of case law that practitioners must follow.
Attorney Jason Tenenbaum has practiced across these areas for over 24 years, writing more than 1,000 appellate briefs and publishing over 2,353 legal articles that attorneys and clients rely on for guidance. The analysis in this article reflects real courtroom experience — from motion practice in Civil Court and Supreme Court to oral arguments before the Appellate Division — and a deep understanding of how New York courts actually apply the law in practice.
About This Topic
Fee Schedule Issues in No-Fault Insurance
The New York no-fault fee schedule establishes the maximum reimbursement rates for medical treatment provided to injured motorists. Disputes over fee schedule calculations, coding, usual and customary charges, and the applicability of workers compensation fee schedules to no-fault claims are common. These articles analyze fee schedule regulations, court decisions on reimbursement disputes, and the practical challenges providers face in obtaining appropriate payment under the no-fault system.
118 published articles in Fee Schedule
Keep Reading
More Fee Schedule Analysis
Acupuncture Reimbursements and Insurance Legalities Explained
Explore the Forrest Chen v. GEICO case and its impact on acupuncture insurance reimbursements in NY. Key insights for providers and patients.
Dec 11, 2024Simple addition is insufficient
NY court rules simple addition insufficient to prove proper fee schedule calculations in no-fault insurance case, requiring detailed evidence of code utilization.
May 22, 2021Interesting new regulation fee schedule discussion and an example of sloppiness?
Analysis of Tyorkin v Garrison case discussing New York no-fault insurance regulation fee schedule defenses and NF-10 denial form requirements in 2016 court decision.
Jun 3, 2016Initial visit allowed – open question being how much
Court rules acupuncturists can bill for initial visits under code 99202, but leaves open question about reimbursement rates compared to chiropractors.
Sep 25, 2013Fee Schedule Defenses in NY No-Fault Insurance: St. Vincent Med Care Case Analysis
Analysis of St. Vincent Med Care v Country-Wide Insurance case regarding fee schedule defenses and bundled services in NY no-fault insurance claims for healthcare providers.
Dec 20, 2009Fee Schedule/not precluded
Analysis of Oleg's Acupuncture v Hereford Insurance case examining fee schedule defenses, untimely denials, and certified medical coder affidavits in NY no-fault claims.
Jan 26, 2018Common Questions
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the no-fault fee schedule?
New York's no-fault fee schedule, established by the Workers' Compensation Board and the Department of Financial Services, sets the maximum reimbursement rates that no-fault insurers must pay for medical services. When an insurer pays less than the billed amount, citing the fee schedule as a defense, the provider can challenge the reduction by demonstrating that the fee schedule was improperly applied or that the services are not subject to fee schedule limitations.
Can a medical provider charge more than the fee schedule allows?
Medical providers treating no-fault patients are generally limited to the amounts set by the fee schedule and cannot balance-bill the patient for the difference. However, certain services may not be covered by the fee schedule, and disputes about whether a specific service falls within the fee schedule are common in no-fault litigation. The Department of Financial Services periodically updates the fee schedule rates.
How are fee schedule disputes resolved in no-fault arbitration?
When an insurer partially pays a claim citing the fee schedule, the provider can challenge the reduction through no-fault arbitration. The provider must demonstrate that the service billed is not subject to the fee schedule or that the fee schedule was incorrectly applied. The insurer bears the burden of proving the fee schedule applies and the correct rate was used. Fee schedule disputes often involve coding issues, modifier usage, and applicability of Workers' Compensation rates.
Does the no-fault fee schedule apply to all medical services?
Not all medical services are subject to the no-fault fee schedule. Certain services, supplies, and procedures may fall outside its scope, in which case the provider may bill the usual and customary rate. Disputes about whether a specific service or billing code is covered by the fee schedule are common. The Workers' Compensation Board fee schedule and the Department of Financial Services ground rules guide which services are covered and at what rates.
Was this article helpful?
About the Author
Jason Tenenbaum, Esq.
Jason Tenenbaum is the founding attorney of the Law Office of Jason Tenenbaum, P.C., headquartered at 326 Walt Whitman Road, Suite C, Huntington Station, New York 11746. With over 24 years of experience since founding the firm in 2002, Jason has written more than 1,000 appeals, handled over 100,000 no-fault insurance cases, and recovered over $100 million for clients across Long Island, Nassau County, Suffolk County, Queens, Brooklyn, Manhattan, the Bronx, and Staten Island. He is one of the few attorneys in the state who both writes his own appellate briefs and tries his own cases.
Jason is admitted to practice in New York, New Jersey, Florida, Texas, Georgia, and Michigan state courts, as well as multiple federal courts. His 2,353+ published legal articles analyzing New York case law, procedural developments, and litigation strategy make him one of the most prolific legal commentators in the state. He earned his Juris Doctor from Syracuse University College of Law.
Disclaimer: This article is published by the Law Office of Jason Tenenbaum, P.C. for informational and educational purposes only. It does not constitute legal advice, and no attorney-client relationship is formed by reading this content. The legal principles discussed may not apply to your specific situation, and the law may have changed since this article was last updated.
New York law varies by jurisdiction — court decisions in one Appellate Division department may not be followed in another, and local court rules in Nassau County Supreme Court differ from those in Suffolk County Supreme Court, Kings County Civil Court, or Queens County Supreme Court. The Appellate Division, Second Department (which covers Long Island, Brooklyn, Queens, and Staten Island) and the Appellate Term (which hears appeals from lower courts) each have distinct procedural requirements and precedents that affect litigation strategy.
If you need legal help with a fee schedule matter, contact our office at (516) 750-0595 for a free consultation. We serve clients throughout Long Island (Huntington, Babylon, Islip, Brookhaven, Smithtown, Riverhead, Southampton, East Hampton), Nassau County (Hempstead, Garden City, Mineola, Great Neck, Manhasset, Freeport, Long Beach, Rockville Centre, Valley Stream, Westbury, Hicksville, Massapequa), Suffolk County (Hauppauge, Deer Park, Bay Shore, Central Islip, Patchogue, Brentwood), Queens, Brooklyn, Manhattan, the Bronx, Staten Island, and Westchester County. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.