If you were injured due to someone else’s careless actions, we understand the challenges you may be facing. As a victim or a surviving family member, you could be dealing with the life-altering consequences of a serious accident.
People v Grennon (Scott), 2011 NY Slip Op 21265 (App. Term 2d Dept. 2011)
In this case, Defendant beat a 0.19% reading and convinced the Appellate Term that traveling at 30-35 mph over the speed limit, combined with indicia of alcohol consumption was insufficient to prove a common-law DWI charge. Very interesting.
This is a case that belongs in the New York Post.
Car Accidents
Slip & Fall
Product Liability
Dog Bites
Motorcyclist Accidents
Premises Liability
Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI)
Truck Accidents
Workplace Discrimination
Wrongful Termination
Harassment
Wage & Hour
Pregnancy Discrimination
Medical Expenses
Lost Wages
Uninsured Motorist
Loss/Expenses
MVAIC
Choosing the right legal representation is one of the most critical decisions you can make after an accident.
Partnering with a skilled, experienced, and dedicated personal injury attorney can bolster your case and position you to secure the full financial compensation you’re entitled to.
Our firm is ready to manage every aspect of your case, including negotiations with insurance companies. We reject inadequate settlement offers and relentlessly fight for the maximum compensation you rightfully deserve.
Contact Us – We’re Here to Help
5 Responses
You would have beat the speeding charge as well as the Intoxifation charge JT. Bad lawyering all around. If only this guy Gannon read the NY Post instead of the NY Times.
I mean the NY Times instead of the NY Post.
The power of the insurance industry means insurance companies do not have to honor their contractual agreements to pay benefits.
The power of the alcohol lobby will lead to the legalization of drunk driving.
Mark my words you heard it on the Pit … I mean the Defender.
I find no joy in drunk drivers being acquitted, nor in the acquittal of anyone who appears to have actually committed a crime. No lecture about the State’s burden is required; I know all about it.
“nor in the acquittal of anyone who appears to have actually committed a crime.”
“appears”
I was right in considering you and the rest of the neocon teabaggers as stupid neanderthals.
Larry you don’t the first thing about politically motivated prosecutions whereas I have seen them and actually been part of them.
Shut up