Sung Bok Lee v Metropolitan Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co, 2011 NY Slip Op 50110(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2011)
The Appellate Term Second Department does not seem impressed with JHO Spodak’s analysis of why the DOI is unable to interpret its own regulations.
If you were injured due to someone else’s careless actions, we understand the challenges you may be facing. As a victim or a surviving family member, you could be dealing with the life-altering consequences of a serious accident.
Sung Bok Lee v Metropolitan Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co, 2011 NY Slip Op 50110(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2011)
The Appellate Term Second Department does not seem impressed with JHO Spodak’s analysis of why the DOI is unable to interpret its own regulations.
Car Accidents
Slip & Fall
Product Liability
Dog Bites
Motorcyclist Accidents
Premises Liability
Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI)
Truck Accidents
Workplace Discrimination
Wrongful Termination
Harassment
Wage & Hour
Pregnancy Discrimination
Medical Expenses
Lost Wages
Uninsured Motorist
Loss/Expenses
MVAIC
Choosing the right legal representation is one of the most critical decisions you can make after an accident.
Partnering with a skilled, experienced, and dedicated personal injury attorney can bolster your case and position you to secure the full financial compensation you’re entitled to.
Our firm is ready to manage every aspect of your case, including negotiations with insurance companies. We reject inadequate settlement offers and relentlessly fight for the maximum compensation you rightfully deserve.
Contact Us – We’re Here to Help
One Response
Oh J.T. what a foul. What a false headline. The Court’s decision was allegedly rendered on January 26, 2011. The Court had no idea of Justice Spodek’s decision when it rendered its own. As the Court was not aware of it the Court did consider it therefore the Court could not diss it.
You must fear Justice … that’s right he’s a Justice… Justice Spodek’s decision to pull such a stunt.
Do you really think that I am going to bring the argument before the App Term 2nd.
To my colleagues on the Plaintiff’s side keep it out of the 1st and 2nd. I know you won’t listen. Many of you are terminally brainless, but try to use logic.
In the App Term 2nd and even the 1st the law has very little to do with outcomes in these No Fault cases. The plan is obviously to drive no fault cases from the courts and damage the providers as much as possible in the process.
And many of you should be damaged because you are so very stupid.
I was at the App Term the other day by the way. I was just hanging out. Smoking. Loitering. Chewing gum. And I saw a moving company moving furniture and stuff into the building. And I asked “Who’s moving in bro.” And this guy answers … not the guy I asked but just some guy … he may have been affiliated with the building or the moving company or maybe not … could have been just some guy
But he says: “GEICO’s taking over one of the floors.”
Then some other guy. Didn’t even get a good look at him cause he was kind of hidden in the crowd. But he says … he just yells out … to who I don’t know … but he says:
“Allstate moved into the Eastern District building last month.”
I don’t know if its true. Maybe Cuomo is trying to close the budget gap by renting government space to insurance companies. I heard when he was the A.G. there was insurance companies all over that building too.