I guess when you write many briefs, you forgot to change your template to accord your legal arguments to the actual facts. Ultimate Health Prods., Inc.
SAL Med., P.C. v Clarendon Natl. Ins. Co., 2015 NY Slip Op 51449(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2015) “The defect in one of the peer review reports submitted
Innovative MR Imaging, P.C. v Praetorian Ins. Co., 2015 NY Slip Op 51402(U)(App. Term 1st Dept. 2015) “In opposition to defendant’s motion, plaintiff submitted two letters of
Quiroz v Zottola, 2015 NY Slip Op 04627 (2d Dept. 2015) “Moreover, the trial court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in limiting the cross-examination of Zottola.
Auto One Ins. Co. v Hillside Chiropractic, P.C., 2015 NY Slip Op 01750 (1st Dept. 2015)(1st Dept 2015) “We find that the no-fault arbitrator’s decision to adhere,
People v. Haywood, 2015 N.Y. Slip Op. 00555 (2d Dept. 2015) “The trial court properly precluded the defendant from cross-examining one of the complaining witnesses regarding
Flanger v 2461 Elm Realty Corp., 2014 NY Slip Op 08532 (3d Dept. 2014) “Defendant also submitted the affidavit of an alleged expert engineer who opined that
Knight v M & M Sanitation Corp., 2014 NY Slip Op 07631 (2d Dept. 2014) This serious injury trial was problem for Plaintiff on may accounts. But
Young v Lacy, 2014 NY Slip Op 06417 (4th Dept. 2014) This is an interesting case on impeaching a witness with improperly filed tax returns. Looks like
People v Laracuente, 21 AD3d 1389 (4th Dept. 2005) “We reject the further contention of defendant that the court abused its discretion in limiting his cross-examination
Matter of Western Ramapo Sewer Extension Project, 2014 NY Slip Op 05889 (2d Dept. 2014) “The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in precluding two of the
Matter of Matter of State of New York v Dennis K., 2014 NY Slip Op 05884 (2d Dept. 2014 “The Supreme Court did not err in denying
