20% deficit is a serious injuryOctober 31, 2018

Kholdarov v Hyman, 2018 NY Slip Op 07111 (2d Dept. 2018)

“In opposition, the plaintiff submitted the affirmed report of a neurologist who examined the plaintiff on March 16, 2016. The neurologist measured the range of motion of the cervical region of the plaintiff’s spine and compared his results to what would be considered normal range of motion. The neurologist found a 20 percent deficit in the flexion of the plaintiff’s cervical spine, but otherwise found the results to be normal”

Leave a Reply