Proofs insufficient under PA lawMay 4, 2015

Quality Psychological Servs. v Infinity Prop. & Cas. Co., 2015 NY Slip Op 50645(U)(App. Term 1st Dept. 2015)

“While defendant-insurer submitted proof indicating that it properly rescinded the underlying insurance policy pursuant to Pennsylvania law based upon misrepresentations made by the insured, one Catrina Gordon, in the underlying policy application, defendant failed to demonstrate that plaintiff’s assignor, who was injured in an accident involving the Gordon vehicle, was “not an innocent third party” who should be precluded from receiving protection under the policy”